Michael Moloney

Public Forum – Lead us not…

Look inside:

Why Punish Me? Augustine’s sinful lust unwrapped


Note: Uncorrected galley proof, for review only

Table of Contents

Introduction

Chapter 1 – The Wickedness of St Augustine

Chapter 2 – The Dark Imprint from Augustine’s Sin of Sexual Lust

Chapter 3 – How Britons are Hard-Wired with Augustinian Guilt

Chapter 4 – The ‘Religiosity Gap’ in Mental Health Provision

Chapter 5 – Spiritual Well-being and Augustine’s Unsound Mores

Chapter 6 – A Righteous Punishment, Blessed by St Augustine

Chapter 7 – ‘In Persona Christi’ The Disgrace of Instant Forgiveness

Chapter 8 – Are We Born Evil? Science and Augustinian Guilt

Chapter 9 – Augustine’s Torment Embedded in Western Mores

Chapter 10 – Child Sexual Abuse and the Augustinian Factor

Chapter 11 – Clerical Child Abuse and Augustine’s Influence

Chapter 12 – Religious Tolerance, Faith Schools and Sin

Chapter 13 – From Pupil to Teacher – a Journey Out of Shame

References and Bibliography


Introduction

Wilt thou forgive that sin where I begun

Which was my sin, though it were done before?

Wilt thou forgive that sin, through which I run,

And do run still, though still I do deplore?

When thou hast done, thou hast not done,

For I have more.

A Hymn to God the Father by John Donne.

Whether or not religion spawns tension and violence around the world is an issue that has been exhaustively discussed elsewhere, and is beyond the modest ambitions of this book.  What I hope to do is show how the teaching in certain schools can disadvantage children who are, as I was, imaginative and impressionable.  Having a sensitive nature is a positive attribute: it is what makes us human.  However, sensitive individuals are especially susceptible to corrosive feelings of guilt and shame.  These feelings are sharpened by the relentless burden of culpability imputed by Augustine of Hippo, one of Christianity’s foremost saints.  St Augustine deemed all humans inherently depraved and sinful, from birth.  We will look at Augustine’s fourth century teaching and the subjective effect of the drill and doctrine imposed on infants in some faith schools today.  Modern thinking, and the new research that we will review, challenges Augustine’s dismal verdict on the human condition.  We will explore the state’s long collaboration with the church, which ensures Augustine’s archaic preoccupation with sinfulness continues to be ingrained into the minds of all British infants.   Reviewing evidence of the influence Augustine’s ideas have on the long-term mental well-being of apostates, we discover that this group is widely misrepresented in academic research endorsing religious belief.  Finally, noting that clerical child sexual abuse (cCSA) continues to bedevil church institutions today, we consider whether instruction in Augustinian theology might play a role in cCSA.  From time to time, I will intrude with examples from my own experience as a follower and former acolyte.  I will show how Augustine’s sin-centred teaching stimulated and sustained a negative mental schema that I endured for much of my life.

A friend of mine shared an instructive story.  He said, ‘My dad hated seeing people baring an open mouth.  When I was a boy, he often used to say that if a fly gets in your mouth, your teeth will turn black and fall out.  I am in my forties now, and I know that he was joking, but to this day I close my mouth if I see a fly.  It’s instinctive: half the time I don’t realise I’m doing it.’

The founder of my old school, Cardinal John Henry Newman (recently canonised and now St Newman), put the idea another way.  He wrote in his school notebook, ‘Train up a child in the way he should go, and, when he is old, he will not depart from it.’[i]  Reading the reports of evasiveness by the Vatican in response to the disclosures of cCSA,[ii] I thought back to my childhood and the religious education (RE) that I had undergone in schools.  Existing literature offers implausible rationalisations for cCSA, while my memory of school drill in rites and rituals offers an explanation that I find persuasive, and it reaches back in history to implicate that keystone of Western Christianity, St Augustine.  It occurred to me that teaching Augustine’s ideas might inadvertently build a favourable grounding for the subsequent exploitation of a child. 

St Augustine, whose literature informs Christian faith, was a tormented man writing in unenlightened times.  A revered doctor of the church, he is held up as a role model for healthy spiritual development.  Yet, as bishop of Hippo, he advocated a dubious moral code and he wrote disgusting tracts about infant sexuality.  Later, when we examine his life, we will review the historical background that helps explain this apparent paradox.  We will evaluate the soundness of his ideas, which are not just tolerated but compulsorily taught to infants as definitive in Britain’s schools.

As soon as I could speak, my mother told me what all what all infants in Christian households are told, that I was born with original sin and I had been baptised to wash the sin out.  Later in life I learned that original sin is Augustine’s mark of guilt for concupiscence (sexual lust),[iii] which by his decree is ineradicable.  In his autobiographical works, Augustine wrote of ‘filth’ and the ‘itch of lust in infants’,[iv] declaring that babies are born stained with guilt from original sin, the sin of sexual lust.  He reframed baptism to do away with the sinful flesh, but he held that lust is not removed.[v]

When I started my own family, Augustine’s idea that children are contaminated by the lust of their parents in conceiving them was hideous and repugnant.  In the Augustinian view, a baby is not innocent and unsullied, with potential for self-determination.  Rather, a child is born in sexual sin and needs external regulation for the rest of its life to control its lustful impulses.  Most Christian adults take a blithe view of original sin and many will be unfamiliar with the significance of the rite of baptism.  However, St Augustine’s teaching is required reading for church men and women who learn that baptism does not entirely cleanse original sin.  Sexual lust is dampened down but some concupiscence remains in a baptised infant, a doctrine endorsed in the catechism of the Catholic Church.[vi]

Teachers and parents might overlook or ignore the sexual connotations, but we will see how clergy focus their lives on scripture.  The overwhelming majority of priests and vicars I meet seem kindly and well meaning, yet they insist children are born marked with the stain of original sin.[vii]  If they did not believe Augustine’s doctrine that there was sin from carnal guilt in little children that needed acknowledgement and forgiveness, they would not solemnise baptism, because sacramental grace to douse lust would be superfluous. 

Augustinian theology is the bedrock of Christian faith in the Western Church, inculcating notions of personal guilt and sin.  RE is required and funded by the government, and schools in the UK are obliged by law to promote Augustine’s fatalistic doctrines.[viii]  In fact, only 60% of primary schools currently comply,[ix] but in these schools RE helps shape the lives of nearly one half of British infants.[x]   These children are having their life chances affected by reciting unhelpful prayers like the ones we will review in chapter two.  Infants are told they were inflicted at birth with the stain of original sin.  As these children grow up, clerics, supported by teachers and childcare workers, reinforce the disgrace they administered by getting children to perform Augustine’s penitential admission of wrongdoing and making them beg for forgiveness and mercy.[xi]  Chapter 3 draws attention to how impressionable infants are inculcated with these unhelpful ideas.  Reviewing primary school curricula, we find Augustine’s hair-shirt ritual of self-inflicted guilt and censure is still recited by infants in faith schools.[xii]  Receptive young minds are repetitively weighed down with his ancient creed of mock sinfulness and self-blame.

Teachers on both sides of the Atlantic used to put dull pupils in a corner and make them wear a pointy dunce cap.  This practice of open humiliation was scrapped 100 years ago.  Yet today the state supports schools that publicly shame children with Augustine’s contrived guilt.  In 1927, British philosopher and Nobel laureate Bertrand Russell declared ‘People in church debasing themselves and saying they are miserable sinners, and all the rest of it, seems contemptible and not worthy of self-respecting human beings.’  Nearly a century later the cradle of Russell’s intellect still requires infants to be indoctrinated in these self-abusive terms.  The pages that follow examine the background to this shameful tradition, how it is enforced and propagated in today’s schools, how it inhibits some children and how it might tempt acts of cCSA.  Here we unravel how discriminatory government appointments ensure the perpetuation of Augustine’s negative creed.

My RE was actually Augustinian indoctrination, similar to that in many faith schools, and as you progress through these pages it will become clear why I take pains to make this distinction.  Shrewd intellectual critiques of religion by Anthony Grayling, Richard Dawkins, Victor Stenger, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris, Dan Barker and the late and much-lamented Christopher Hitchens, among many others, fill the bookshelves.  But these great men cannot speak for those who spent years being indoctrinated and drilled, as I was, in Augustine’s undignified ideology. 

RE was plain and simple in my schooldays, but for today’s schoolchildren it is technically sophisticated.  Demand for religious content is sufficient to sustain commercial producers offering slick media presentations, including Augustine’s penitential pleading.  Using well-conducted research studies we examine how school drill and doctrine instils Augustine’s potentially disturbing ideas in young minds.  Then we look at some of the measurable outcomes in affected Western societies.  I will argue that Christianity’s Augustinian teaching can have enduring and far-reaching effects on some children into adulthood.  We will compare his primitive ideas with recent scientific discoveries and then review compelling evidence that the attitude of adults towards children is shaped by Augustine’s unsafe teaching.

Almost all children (99%) schooled in Britain today will go on to renounce religion soon afterwards, as I did.[xiii]  Unfortunately, apart from the wasted hours of misspent lesson time, repudiation does not promptly disengage the billions of neural connections made in the brain during a child’s formative years.[xiv]  I, and countless other apostates, have experienced distress caused by the RE we received in childhood.  Little rigorous research has been published regarding the lifelong effect of instilling Augustine’s ideas in young people.[xv]  Indoctrination of minors as a factor contributing to mental ill-health is surprisingly lacking from that literature which does exist.  The possible effect of sustained drilling on the minds of receptive infants has not escaped notice entirely, but research presents particular challenges.  In extreme cases, RE gives rise to trauma,[xvi] but the milder upset borne by others is unrecorded and quietly disregarded.  We will look at the work that has been done and the difficulties involved in the study of religion.  Comparing diverse cultures, we see how Augustinian guilt is so prevalent in Western societies it has become normalised.  Here we will learn why existing literature claiming benefits for religiosity is unreliable, and we hear about a surprising inhibition reported by psychologists to explain why this field of study is shunned by academia.

The mental scars inflicted by my upbringing in a Roman Catholic (RC) community still mark me.  Following my parents’ alienation at the behest of a priest, my mother sent me to a Catholic boarding school where I encountered abuse.  Reading the many reports of child exploitation and sexual abuse and reflecting on my own experiences, I was moved to speculate why the Christian community appears to hold an unduly liberal attitude towards the mistreatment of children.  It is not just clerics who shock us with their abuse of children.  Nuns also seem disposed to mistreat young people, as the unmarried mothers-to-be care homes scandals noted here show.  Examining the literature, we question why some ecclesiastics seem to have a disdainful view of children, typified by my indecent clerical beating overseen by nuns, described in chapter 6.  We review speeches by bishops in the House of Lords to discover why the English, unlike other secular populations, continue to permit children to be physically punished in the home.

Augustine’s version of the ritual known as penance, also called confession or reconciliation (meaning reconciliation with God, not with the victim of wrongdoing), is morally questionable.  His doctrine, discussed in chapter 7, teaches children a moral code of mock culpability, secretive disengaged justice, and arbitrary retribution, which conflicts with the principles of fairness accepted by enlightened societies.  I recall the sense of ambivalence and the moral limbo I experienced in my adolescence as I struggled to resolve the confusing beliefs I had been indoctrinated with ­– beliefs that I did not value and did not own.

Followers deem that when a priest forgives transgressions, he stands as Christ, in person.  We look behind the Latin phrase in Persona Christi, the title given to Catholic priests by the pope, meaning that a priest stands ‘in the person of Christ’, which allows priests to forgive sins.  Although generally associated with Catholicism, all Western denominations offer to forgive transgressions without thought or consideration for the aggrieved party.  Christians are accountable only to a confessor for wrongdoing and the confessor is compelled by canon law to absolve the penitent if they are contrite and accepts a penance, usually prayers to the saints.  If a believer is sorry and has confessed, forgiveness is guaranteed by canon law regardless of any moral or judicial considerations.  Those who find comfort in religion can develop ethical blind spots or maladaptive feelings of guilt, and we will examine these issues as we progress.  We go on to consider enlightened concepts of decency and fair play compared with Augustine’s ancient philosophy.  We explore contemporary approaches to wrongdoing which displace Augustinian ideas with evidence-based methodologies.  Government research demonstrates the superiority of progressive judicial systems like restorative justice.

We have considered Augustine’s readings on the doctrines of original sin, penance and sacrifice.  In chapter 8 we are ready to sift the moral lessons these ideas teach our schoolchildren.  Augustine thought humans were born wicked and predisposed to being bad and sinful.  He taught that only the Christian God can distinguish right from wrong.  Acts of goodness can only be achieved by means of God’s grace, and forgiveness is His sole prerogative.  We look at game changing advances made by British researchers in identifying the source of human morality and we find Augustine was wrong.  Far from his doctrine of preordained human wickedness, science reveals we are born with a socially positive and valuable sense of cooperation and fair play.  This valuable sense of right and wrong that has evolved in humans predates Augustine by thousands of years.  Telling children that they were born wicked and are predisposed to evil is not only potentially harmful, it is also dishonest.

Examining psychologists’ assessments of Augustine’s state of mind, we take time out here and allow ourselves to speculate upon why he took the view he did.  Aided by expert study, this light-hearted digression offers a fascinating theory that could account for Augustine’s dark psyche.  No other country in the world demands all its children be indoctrinated in outdated Augustinian values.  We uncover the sordid reason why the British state alone continues its headlong charge in a direction opposite to the wishes and needs of the majority of its citizens.

In the course of my research for this book I have encountered thousands of accounts from adults articulating feelings of exploitation and betrayal by their evangelical schoolteachers.[xvii]  Like me, these individuals were too naïve to demur as infants.  Now, many express a view like mine; that their schooling punished them.  Here we review some of the disturbing ideas and images infants are being exposed to in faith schools.  It is hard to disagree with Dawkins when he claims that religious indoctrination is a form of child abuse.[xviii]  Dawkins was criticised by Augustinian apologists for insulting people who have endured physical child abuse, but having been abused mentally and physically myself I can speak from both sides of the argument.  However, the term abuse is contentious and I prefer to describe religious indoctrination as a form of punishment.  According to Merriam-Webster, punishment is ‘suffering, pain, or loss that serves as retribution’.[xix]  Indoctrination in Augustine’s ideas undoubtedly punishes some children, and the evidence for that claim is contained in these pages, which recount my childhood experience.

Reviewing judicial reports and criminal records, we look at the backgrounds of convicted child sex offenders and the personal histories of the world’s most notorious distributors of child pornography, to identify a correlative influence.   With caveats regarding data collection and acknowledging international and cultural inconsistencies in defining child abuse, we move on to investigate recent records of ‘darknet’ internet child pornography.  Then we compare that data with countries where Augustine’s followers are dominant.

Chapter 11 trawls through the many theories that have been posited to explain the aberration that is cCSA.  We have noted the remarkable paucity of rigorous research in this field.  In the absence of clear evidence, the cause of clerical cCSA is open to speculation.  A report commissioned by the Catholic Church itself implies that nearly three quarters of victims of predatory clerics fell within the range that would identify the abusers as paedophiles, according to the clinicians’ manual.  We consider whether the Augustinian theology nuns and clerics are taught regarding infant concupiscence might be a factor in cCSA.  Could Augustine’s doctrines on infantile guilt and culpability be unconsciously moulding the attitude of clerics towards young people?  The church’s report goes on to confirm that the indoctrination clergy receive in seminaries is a factor in cases of cCSA.  Here is testimony from the church itself, admitting the far-reaching influence of Augustine’s unsafe ideas.

In the last few decades, the Christian communion has been confronted with an avalanche of cCSA cases from around the world.  Most claims involve Catholic priests, but thousands of Church of England (C of E) clerics have also been implicated in cCSA.  Although the Catholic community has the most cases of abuse at the time of writing in March 2021, cCSA has been uncovered throughout the Christian communion, despite having been carefully concealed by ecclesiastics at every level of authority.  The C of E has been obliged to deal with thousands of complaints of cCSA and has taken desperate measures to cover up cases of abuse.[xx],[xxi],[xxii]  Finally, analysing the latest government statistics, we assess whether clerics are more liable than others in society to sexually abuse children today.

Recent high-profile lawsuits and harrowing testimony given to public inquiries have kept the issue in the headlines.  Meanwhile, cover-ups continue to surface, and victims’ groups say the churches have not done nearly enough to guarantee reform and safeguard children.  Church history is laden with prevarication and evasion in dealing with cases of cCSA.2  Despite multiple demands for change to Church procedures and practices, safeguarding has been erratic and half-hearted.  We explore evidence that ever since Augustine, cCSA has bedevilled the Church, while ecclesiastics have carefully papered over cases within their ranks.[xxiii]  Evidently, little has changed and new cases are still being reported.  In November 2020, the UK Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) reported that the crisis is ‘far from a solely historical issue’, adding that more than 100 allegations of cCSA had been reported each year since 2016.[xxiv]

I am indebted to Lorna Graham who wrote the final chapters of this book.  With 26 years’ experience of teaching in primary schools and in secondary religious education, Lorna writes with authority about infant proselytisation and the current obsolete connection between the state and religion.  Media attention has rightly focused on radicalisation, highlighting the danger posed to society by fanatical religious indoctrination.  Less attention has been given to the routine teaching in state-funded primary faith schools that Lorna explores.  Some readers have expressed doubt that the practices described in these pages are relevant today.  Lorna corrects this misconception with accounts of her primary school classroom experience, and parents themselves describe intensive faith indoctrination.[xxv]  Ofsted reports give a disturbing picture of how primary school RE lessons are being conducted today.[xxvi]

Sex and Relationships Education (SRE), recently introduced into British schools, is not as widely taught as some might think.  In fact many schools do not publish a policy on SRE and others neglect to cover the subject fully or misrepresent the facts.[xxvii]  For an annual subscription of £456.00, Ten:Ten Resources will provide lessons to meet the government’s requirement for objective relationships, sex and health education (RSHE) ‘…through the prism of Catholic RSHE’.[xxviii]  In other words, RSHE will be delivered in an explicitly distorted, faith-friendly form.  Chapter 12 highlights the omissions and inaccuracies that result from schoolteachers failing to present the facts of life clearly and objectively.  The failure to give comprehensive information on this important topic is liable to put young people at a serious disadvantage when they leave school.

Before progressing further, it is useful to clarify the lexicon used by professionals in the field.  The terms child grooming, child molestation, child sexual abuse and child sexual exploitation (CSE) might be used interchangeably by the media, but there are important distinctions.  Grooming is the process whereby an adult prepares a child to ease the way for sexual abuse.  Molestation is an outmoded term; child sexual abuse is more precise and is the preferred term to describe an adult using a child for sexual stimulation.  According to Google Trends (trend.google.com), child sexual abuse is slowly becoming the more popular search string.  CSE is an umbrella term, which covers all child sexual abuse including prostituting, trafficking and underage marriage.

The NSPCC says, ‘When a child or young person is sexually abused, they’re forced or tricked into sexual activities.  They might not understand that what’s happening is abuse or that it’s wrong.  And they might be afraid to tell someone’, and ‘Abuse is sexual touching of any part of a child’s body, whether they’re clothed or not.’  The Sexual Offences Act 2003 defines inappropriate touching as sexual assault if (a) the touching is intentional, (b) the touching is sexual, (c) the child is under 16.  The Act goes on to define touching as sexual if a reasonable person would consider that, (a) whatever its circumstances or any person’s purpose in relation to it, it is because of its nature sexual, or (b) because of its nature it may be sexual and because of its circumstances or the purpose of any person in relation to it (or both) it is sexual.  Touching includes touching, (a) with any part of the body, (b) with anything else, (c) through anything.[xxix]

Thus, the boundaries for what constitutes child sexual abuse are wide but clear and detailed.  Bearing in mind the context, and the relationship between clergy and altar boy, any touching other than hand to hand is inappropriate and therefore could meet the criteria for sexual assault.  If I were to cite simply abuse or another general term when relating the incidents I encountered I might be alluding to any number of acts, varying in gravity and harm.  Since there could be uncertainty, I have made a point of particularising the behaviours I witnessed or experienced and I trust the reader will understand the necessity for my accounts to be graphic and detailed.

From the time I could hold a pen, I have kept a diary in which I scribble anything that catches my interest.  Although my notes were never a strict chronological record of events, some of my early writing survives to trigger memories of my boarding school days.  These recollections provided a starting point for laying out the evidence in the following pages with the authenticity of someone with a lifetime of involvement in the Christian community.  With the Vatican decrying critics of the Church as ‘friends of the devil’,[xxx] I felt spurred to record my experiences to highlight the effect that Augustinian indoctrination has had on my life and on the lives of others. 

Many of the issues raised here are not new.  Countless luminaries have discussed failures in the school curriculum, and secular groups bristle with letters from former faith school pupils voicing their concerns.  I will examine these concerns from the perspective of my personal experience inside and outside the sacristy to shed light on the interaction between clerics and children.  Lorna focuses attention on state-funded faith schools where some children might be affected by the same guilt and moral confusion that has scarred many of us.  We noted earlier that today over one million infants are undergoing similarly unhelpful schooling.  Nearly all of them are likely to reject religion later.  This book gives many good reasons for government to stop financing and promoting religion and end the Church’s outdated participation in education.

A YouGov/Daybreak survey in September 2010 found that school performance was the factor highest rated by parents when considering schools for their children.  The religion of the school was rated as an important factor by fewer than one in ten people.[xxxi]  Over many years, opinion polls have consistently found that a majority of taxpayers do not want to fund faith schools.   In June 2014, The Guardian reported a survey by Opinium showing that 58% of voters believe faith schools, which can give priority to applications from pupils of their faith and are free to teach from the perspective of their own religion, should not be funded by the state or should be abolished.[xxxii],[xxxiii]  Safeguarding should start with separating the state from religion so that schools do not indoctrinate young people and risk preparing them for possible abuse.  Many Christian individuals and institutions carry out valuable charity work, but compassion, altruism and goodwill are pervasive human values that span doctrinal boundaries.  The good work done by some Christians does not compensate me, and millions of others, for the life-changing sectarian indoctrination that we endured.  For those readers who think faith schools have a benign religious function, I hope that the personal experiences I describe and the research explored in the following chapters will give them cause to think again. 

Given the wealth of positive assessments of Augustine already lining the shelves, a critical evaluation seems perilous, but I will depict the man as I see him.  Every step of the way I have referenced my work with original material or other reliable evidence that supports it.  Unfortunately, this has led to a rather overblown reference section, but better that than have my readers left doubtful.  I would like to think that the ideas within are couched in terms accessible to all.  That being the case, I apologise in advance if some viewpoints are perceived to be excessively polemical.  I hope the reader will forgive any impertinence, given my background, and understand that no disrespect is intended.

The National Secular Society (NSS) (https://www.secularism.org.uk), Humanists UK (https://humanism.org.uk) and many other groups campaign vigorously for an end to religious influence in the education of young people.  More information on many of the topics discussed in this book is available on their websites.  Whether or not you believe, as I do, that all children in Britain should enjoy their right to receive a broad and balanced education, free from indoctrination or discrimination based on ethnicity, religion or belief, you might like to contribute to the debate at www.mike-moloney.com.


References

[i] Worsley, Margret.  (1997). St Philip’s from beginning to beginning.  Foreword.  ISBN 1862370788, Quotation is from the Book of Proverbs copied out by John Henry Newman into a schoolboy notebook at the age of nine.

[ii] The Guardian, Child sexual abuse inquiry criticises lack of cooperation from Vatican. Retrieved Oct 28, 2019 from https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/oct/28/child-sexual-abuse-inquiry-criticises-lack-of-cooperation-from-vatican

[iii] Definition of ‘concupiscence’ courtesy of New World Encyclopaedia, Christian View. Retrieved Jun 29, 2020 from https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Concupiscence

[iv] St Augustine The Confessions of St Augustine (c. 397), Translation by Pusey, Edward B. ‘no one is free from sin in (God’s) sight, not even an infant whose span of earthly life is but a single day’ (Book I, p9); ‘The only innocence in infants is the weakness of their frames; the minds of infants are not innocent.’ (Book I, p10); ‘weltering in filth and scratching off the itch of lust…my infant tongue spake freely to thee’ (Book IX, p128); ‘[infants] being yet little ones and carnal’ (Book XII, p213). ISBN: 9781565481541.  The full text is also available in the original Latin free under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License, at www.gutenberg.org

[v] St Augustine On Merit and the Forgiveness of Sins and the Baptism of Infants (Book 1) ‘In infants it is certain that, by the grace of God, through His baptism who came in the likeness of sinful flesh, it is brought to pass that the sinful flesh is done away. This result, however, is so effected, that the concupiscence which is diffused over and innate in the living flesh itself is not removed all at once, so as to exist in it no longer; but only that that might not be injurious to a man at his death, which was inherent at his birth.’ Translated by Peter Holmes and Robert Ernest Wallis, and revised by Benjamin B. Warfield. From Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series, Vol. 5. Edited by Philip Schaff. (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1887.) Chapter 70 [XXXIX.] ASIN: B005FY060U

[vi] CCC, VII The Grace of Baptism. 1264: ‘Yet certain temporal consequences of sin remain in the baptized, such as … concupiscence.’

[vii] CCC, III Original Sin. 411: ‘Mary benefited first of all and uniquely from Christ’s victory over sin: she was preserved from all stain of original sin.’

[viii] The Education Act 1996, section 375 (2), Retrieved Apr 29, 2020 from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/56/section/375

[ix] TeacherTapp.  Teachers are losing their religion – Part. (2019). Retrieved Apr 29, 2020 from  https://teachertapp.co.uk/teachers-are-losing-their-religion-how-religious-are-teachers/

[x] DfE, National Statistics Schools, pupils and their characteristics Academic Year 2019/20, ‘State funded primary schools educate 4.71 million pupils’ Retrieved Aug 20, 2020 from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/schools-pupils-and-their-characteristics-january-2020

[xi] Ten:Ten Resources. PowerPoint prayer presentations for Collective Worship annual subscription £588.00 Penitential Act, Retrieved Aug 30, 2020 https://www.tentenresources.co.uk/primary-subscription/prayers-for-home/sunday-liturgy-for-families/

[xii] Church of England.  Common Worship. Retrieved Mar 11, 2020 from https://www.churchofengland.org/prayer-and-worship/worship-texts-and-resources/common-worship/holy-communion#mm7c

[xiii] British Social Attitudes Survey (2018) Religion, Identity, behaviour and belief over two decades, p6. Retrieved Feb 4, 2021 from https://www.bsa.natcen.ac.uk/media/39293/1_bsa36_religion.pdf

[xiv] Harvard University, Center on the Developing Child, Brain Architecture Retrieved Feb 4, 2021 from https://developingchild.harvard.edu/science/key-concepts/brain-architecture/

[xv] Ed. Jane Bybee, (1998), Guilt and Children, Chapter 7 ISBN: 9780121486105 – Chapter 7, L Fischer and PS Richards, Religion and Guilt in Childhood ISBN: 978-0121486109

[xvi] Jill Mytton interview – Richard Dawkins.  YouTube.  Retrieved Mar 11, 2020 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GXA7GA9yntc

[xvii] National Secular Society (NSS) Retrieved Mar 11, 2020 from Testimonials https://www.nomorefaithschools.org/testimonials.html

[xviii] Cooper R. Mail Online Forcing a religion on your children is as bad as child abuse, claims atheist professor Richard Dawkins (April 22, 2013) Retrieved Mar 11, 2020 from https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2312813/Richard-Dawkins-Forcing-religion-children-child-abuse-claims-atheist-professor.html

[xix] Definition of ‘punishment’ courtesy of Merriam-Webster: 1: the act of punishing; 2: suffering, pain, or loss that serves as retribution Retrieved Apr 23, 2021 from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/punishment

[xx]Wikipedia. Anglican Communion sexual abuse cases. Retrieved Sep 28, 2020 from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anglican_Communion_sexual_abuse_cases&oldid=982153252

[xxi] Jane Corbin, Scandal in the Church of England A BBC Panorama documentary (Apr 29, 2019.)  Also: Exposed: The Church’s Darkest Secret. BBC Channel Two short drama documentaries. (Jan 13, 2020 and Jan 14, 2020.)

[xxii] BBC News. Church of England failures ‘allowed child sexual abusers to hide’. Retrieved Sep 28, 2020 from https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54433295

[xxiii] Sex abuse of minors by priests since AD309: Sex, Priests, and Secret Codes: The Catholic Church’s 2,000 Year Paper Trail of Sexual Abuse.  Thomas P Doyle et al.  2006 ISBN: 1566252652

[xxiv] UK IICSA (Nov 10, 2020) The Roman Catholic Church Investigation-Report Executive Summary: ‘Responses to disclosures about sexual abuse have been characterised by a failure to support victims and survivors in stark contrast to the positive action taken to protect alleged perpetrators and the reputation of the Church.’  ‘It would be wrong, however, to regard child sexual abuse within the Roman Catholic Church as solely a historical problem. Since 2016, there have been more than 100 reported allegations each year.’ Retrieved Oct 12, 2020 from  https://www.iicsa.org.uk/key-documents/23357/view/catholic-church-investigation-report-4-december-2020.pdf

[xxv] ‘Children (4 years old) pray four times a day and have RE four days a week, with links made to this in all subjects.’ ‘When I asked (the teacher) if they teach creationism, she said they talk about all “theories”.’ National Secular Society Parent’s perspective: We made a mistake sending our child to a faith school Retrieved Mar 14, 2021 from https://www.nomorefaithschools.org/testimonials/2020/11/parents-perspective-we-made-a-mistake-sending-our-child-to-a-faith-school

[xxvi] NATRE An analysis of the provision for RE in Primary Schools – Autumn Term 2016 Retrieved Mar 3, 2021 from https://www.natre.org.uk/uploads/Free%20Resources/NATRE%20Primary%20Survey%202016%20final.pdf

[xxvii] NSS Unsafe Sex Education: The risk of letting religious schools teach within the tenets of their faith Retrieved Mar 20, 2021 from https://www.secularism.org.uk/uploads/unsafe-sex-report-april-2018.pdf

[xxviii] Ten:Ten Resources, Relationship and Health Education in Schools (Life to the Full) annual subscription £456.00 Retrieved Sep 28, 2020 from https://www.tentenresources.co.uk

[xxix] The Sexual Offences Act 2003, Chapter 42, Paragraph 78 and Paragraph 79 Part 1

[xxx] The Guardian, Pope Francis decries critics of church as ‘friends of the devil’ (Feb 20, 2019) Retrieved Oct 6, 2020 https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/feb/20/pope-francis-decries-critics-of-church-as-friends-of-the-devil

[xxxi] YouGov / Daybreak Survey Results (Sept 13 2010) Retrieved Apr 12, 2021 from http://cdn.yougov.com/today_uk_import/YGArchives-Life-YouGov-DaybreakReligion-130910.pdf

[xxxii] Toby Helm T and Townsend M. (Jun 14, 2014) The Guardian Taxpayers’ cash should not be used to fund faith schools, say voters Retrieved Feb 7, 2021 from https://www.theguardian.com/education/2014/jun/14/taxpayers-should-not-fund-faith-schools

[xxxiii] Guardian Opinion Poll, ICM Two thirds oppose state aided faith schools (August 2005) Retrieved Apr 10, 2021 from https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2005/aug/23/schools.faithschools